NEW YORK COALITION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT

Executive Sessions

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Must a village board say who it is discussing in executive session?

I’m writing after reading your post on rules local New York governments should follow regarding board meetings. I live in the Village of Arcade, and this past year the board held several what I’ll call “secret” meetings. They posted on their social media page that they were holding meetings about “removing someone from the board” for some “violation,” but they refused to state who it was or what the accusation was.

When I contacted the village and said that posting public information without giving the actual information was tantamount to lying, they said that they had to protect the identity of the person. That makes zero sense if that person is an employee of the village. We have a right to know who it is and what is being charged without having to attend the meeting. Am I crazy?

Can a school board enter executive session without first convening an open meeting?

I am a parent of two Buffalo Public School students and, given the Buffalo Board of Education’s recent issues, have recently begun paying closer attention to how our schools are being led. I’ve attended a couple of meetings and have been trying to educate myself about the Board’s governance, which I’ve found challenging based on the information available on its website. That led me to learn more about the requirements of New York’s Open Meetings Law.

I’ve noticed what appears to be a pattern in which the Board enters executive session without first being in an open meeting. More recently, the Board appears to have voted during one of those sessions on a matter involving the use of public funds. I’m trying to better understand whether these practices are consistent with the requirements of the Open Meetings Law and, if not, what steps I should take to bring attention to the matter.

Additionally, it’s unclear whether the bylaws the Board currently posts on its website (which are listed under “Policies”) are complete and up to date. There are a number of other practices that also raise questions about transparency and adherence to the Board’s own published policies.

Can a city council call a “recess” and meet privately with the city attorney outside of executive session rules?

Not sure if you’ve seen it, but the Niagara Falls City Council recently adopted new public speaking rules. I know there’s no legal requirement for councils to allow public comment—that’s not my concern here.

What I’m asking about is their practice of calling a “recess,” as mentioned in the article below. The council has done this a few times recently. It’s not an executive session—they specifically call it a recess. During that time, they leave the room with the city attorney and later return to resume the meeting.

What are the rules, if any, around this? Is it allowed? Under what circumstances?

Here’s a potentially relevant section of the Niagara Falls City Charter:

C. All meetings of the Council shall be open to the public, and public notice of such meeting and the agenda shall be posted as provided by law. The Council at a regular or committee-of-the-whole meeting may recess in a closed or executive session as provided by law. Convening of an executive session shall be by majority vote of the Council and the yeas and nays shall be recorded in the Journal.

From my reading, it sounds like they “may recess,” but only under conditions allowed by law—presumably the state’s executive session rules. Am I interpreting that correctly?

Is it appropriate for City Councils to go into executive session to discuss jobs and developer fees?

I have a question about City Council meetings.

Is it normal for a council to recess a meeting to allegedly approve an employment application for a government position and also decide they made a mistake in calculating how much a developer owes the city during the same recess? To clarify, the council was progressing through agenda items, then paused to go behind closed doors to make these decisions. I’m unsure if the developers’ lawyers joined them, but I did notice the lawyers left the room where we were watching the meeting.

Is this standard governmental practice? Additionally, the lawyers were with the councilors and mayor behind closed doors before the meeting even started.

What Are School Boards Legally Allowed to Discuss Publicly Regarding Superintendent Contracts?

Thanks for your question.

Individual board members can certainly explain why they voted the way they did on the superintendent’s raise and contract extension without revealing what was discussed in executive session.

The New York State School Board Association outlined the following regarding executive sessions in a guide they published in 2015:

Pursuant to General Municipal Law, school board members, district officers, and employees may not disclose confidential information acquired in the course of their official duties (Gen. Mun. Law § 805-a(1)(b)).

a. The General Municipal Law does not define the term “confidential information.” According to one state court, interpretation of what is confidential in the school context is best left to the commissioner of education (Komyathy v. Board of Educ. Wappinger CSD No. 1, 75 Misc.2d 859).

According to the commissioner of education, matters discussed in a lawfully convened executive session are confidential, and their disclosure constitutes a violation of the General Municipal Law’s prohibition, as well as a violation of a school board member’s oath of office. This could subject a school board member to removal from the board (Application of Nett and Raby, 45 Ed. Dep’t Rep. 259 (2005)). There would be no such violation if a board collectively decides to release such information or if an individual board member is compelled to disclose it pursuant to law in a judicial proceeding (Id.).

Note: The Executive Director of the Committee on Open Government has stated that information discussed in executive session may be disclosed unless a specific statute requires confidentiality (NYS Department of State, Committee on Open Government OML-AO-4489, Sept. 20, 2007; see also OML-AO-3463, May 28, 2002; OML-AO-3449, April 30, 2002; OML-AO-3219, Oct. 26, 2000). However, the commissioner of education considers that view a “narrow interpretation of the term ‘confidential’” (Application of Nett and Raby).

As indicated above, the NY Committee on Open Government has a different view regarding executive sessions and what can be disclosed. As stated in their opinion:

https://docsopengovernment.dos.ny.gov/coog/otext/o4530.html

“Since a public body may choose to conduct an executive session or discuss an issue in public, information expressed during an executive session is not ‘confidential.’ To be confidential, again, a statute must prohibit disclosure and leave no discretion to an agency or official regarding the ability to disclose.”

Hope this helps.

Was This Executive Session Carried Out Properly?

The agenda language you provided is OK, as it is simply informing the public that an executive session motion may occur.

An executive session motion “regarding litigation” is not sufficient under the Open Meetings Law. The name of the lawsuit or litigation being discussed should be stated in the motion.
If the board is simply receiving an update regarding the status of a lawsuit that can and should occur in public.

An executive session motion regarding the “employment history of a particular person” is minimally acceptable under the law. It still leaves the public in the dark, and it would be helpful to at least let the public know that this is in regard to hiring someone, disciplining someone, promoting someone etc.

The executive session motion for “discussion on open seat candidate” is improper under the Open Meetings Law. It is not appropriate to discuss the filling of an elected board position in an executive session.
Filling a public position is not the same as discussing the hiring of other positions.

These are great questions that you have asked.

Attached is a report we did regarding executive sessions, which you may find helpful, along with opinions by the NY Committee on Open Government.

Also attached is a copy of a letter that we sent out to public boards that have discussed filling a vacant board position in an executive session.

New York State Committee on Open Government Opinion

Ulysses Town Board Vacancy Letter

Report: School Boards Across New York State Hold Improper Executive Sessions

Can I Share a Recorded Executive Session?

Your question is an interesting one, with a lot of different parts to consider.

There is no law that states what is discussed in an executive session cannot be disclosed. With limited exceptions such as an individual’s health issues there is no requirement to discuss things in an executive session. An executive session is an option but a town could discuss everything in public.

Many school boards have policies that prohibit disclosing what has been discussed in an executive session and there have been instances where a school board member has been removed for disclosing executive session discussions.
You should check whether your town has a policy or rule regarding executive sessions.

In a 2011 court case, an Erie County Supreme Court Judge ruled that recording an executive session was improper. The Judge stated in her decision:

“An issue did come up over a tape recording that someone did of an executive session of the School Board meeting that involved the Petitioner’s daughter. There is no question the taping of the executive session is improper and violates the confidentiality that is encompassed in the executive session.”

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9019976364571771120&q=stephenson+v+board+of+education&hl=en&as_sdt=4,33

This is an Erie County lower court decision that is not binding on other courts. I am not aware of any other court decisions on this issue.
Below is an opinion from the NY State Committee on Open Government regarding the recording of executive sessions.

https://docs.dos.ny.gov/coog/otext/o5384.html

While it is inappropriate for the town supervisor to insult you with obscene language, posting a recording from an executive session on your Facebook page may result in you being attacked for recording and posting executive session conversations.

You could also bring the Supervisor’s behavior to light by posting about it on your Facebook page without posting the recording.

Can The Subject Of An Ethics Complaint Request A Hearing In Public?

What is the ruling on whether an individual who is the subject of an ethics complaint can request the meeting of the ethics committee be held in public?

In Watertown we have a city councilman who has had a complaint filed against him by the mayor.

There is a meeting scheduled. The agenda has an executive session on it. The councilman has requested the meeting be held in public.

BLOG, NEWS AND REPORTS
August 30, 2026

Must a village board say who it is discussing in executive session?

August 29, 2026

Can a school board enter executive session without first convening an open meeting?

question and answers vector art - q&a
March 27, 2025

Can a city council call a “recess” and meet privately with the city attorney outside of executive session rules?

question and answers vector art - q&a
December 4, 2024

Is it appropriate for City Councils to go into executive session to discuss jobs and developer fees?

question and answers vector art - q&a
June 25, 2024

What Are School Boards Legally Allowed to Discuss Publicly Regarding Superintendent Contracts?

question and answers vector art - q&a
June 12, 2024

Was This Executive Session Carried Out Properly?

question and answers vector art - q&a
January 10, 2024

Can I Share a Recorded Executive Session?

question and answers vector art - q&a
September 13, 2023

Can The Subject Of An Ethics Complaint Request A Hearing In Public?